After the incredibly great response to the recent expert hearing I organized in the EU Parliament on the urgent question of what the dangers are to international aviation safety from the side effects of COVID "vaccinations" on pilots and flight attendants, I was a guest on @steve_bannon|s show "War Room Pandemic" last week with that issue.
Do you remember Mr. Kim Tsoj from Montreal, who came to visit me two weeks ago completely unexpectedly with a big bouquet of flowers at the EU Parliament in Brussels, to thank me for my support of the Canadian Freedom Truckers?
This week we met again - this time together with Ms. Veronique Semexant, who is also connected with the organizers of the Canadian Freedom Convoy. The three of us had an extensive video interview and this much I can already reveal:
I was very pleased having the opportunity to sign the two petitions that the two brought to our meeting.
What are they about? Freedom and justice for the freedom activists and organizers of the Canadian Freedom Convoy, Tamara Lich, Pat King and Chris Barber, who are currently still being held in custody by the Canadian authorities.
More on this next week in my video with my highly appreciated Canadian guests Kim Tsoj and Veronique Semexant!
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
The EMA database of the European Medicines Agency records a very high increase in reported suspected cases of side effects and deaths for the experimental COVID "vaccine". While politicians and the media are still largely turning a blind eye and no meaningful data collection is being carried out, a very special risk group is now coming into focus: pilots and flight attendants!
So far, it appears only in marginal notes in the mainstream media that flights are being canceled because of alleged staff shortages at airlines and airports.
Only one aspect of this is the withdrawal of personnel who did not want to submit to a vaccination regime and therefore moved to other industries and are now no longer available for flight operations.
But even those who complied with the vaccination campaign are probably already being caught up in the consequences of their decision. This is particularly relevant for pilots.
These may become permanently unfit to fly due to the side effects and become a risk to the entire air traffic. If you imagine that the pilot of a fully occupied jumbo jet suffers heart problems or a circulatory collapse during the approach to a major city airport, you can see how the previous personal risk of an individual suddenly becomes a potential danger for everyone.
For this important and so far not publicly discussed topic area, I would like to urgently bring about the necessary attention and clarify with international experts which distortions the COVID vaccination campaign has triggered and will continue to trigger, especially in the flight sector.
Look forward to my event, which will take place tomorrow on 05.07.2022 at 19:30 (CET) in the EU Parliament in Strasbourg with speeches by Philipp Kruse (lawyer, LLM.), representatives of "Airliners for Humanity" and "Navigants Libres". This will be followed by a question - answer session.
You can also participate via live stream using this link:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/streaming/...
I am looking forward to your numerous interest!
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
At the "ID Study Days" - the ID Group's three-day conclave in Paris - I also obtained information on the topic of cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, in a presentation by Francois-Louis Michaud, the Executive Director of the European Financial Supervisory Authority.
To what extent does regulation at the EU level make any sense at all, when the market is following completely different developments globally? Can it be ruled out that instruments of such regulation will also be used to restrict civil liberties, as we recently saw with the blocking of Canadian Freedom Truckers' wallets? What is the banking regulator's position on the ban on “proof of work”?
The European Banking Authority says it initially divides players into two categories: Service providers that take a libertarian, "radical" approach to freeing themselves from the banking system, and multinational companies that harness crypto assets to evade banking regulation.
Accordingly, the authority is also pursuing two approaches: First, it wants to offer a comparable product in the form of "digital central bank currency" to be used as a cross-border, low-cost means of payment. There is no specific timetable, but this goal is being pursued “at full speed”. The second approach is to force players who offer payment services to undergo regulation so that no competitive advantage is created over players who are already subject to regulation.
Within the framework of the G20, coordination of measures is to be sought, but nothing concrete can be said about this yet.
It is also important to the European Financial Supervisory Authority that all issuers of cryptocurrencies must identify themselves and align their activities with a catalog of measures.
However, the idea of anonymous, or pseudonymous cryptocurrencies would not be able to be pursued further with this.
There was no concrete rejection that regulatory measures would not also be used to restrict civil rights. It was emphasized, however, that an "inclusive" approach was also being sought for digital services, so that people for example who do not own or cannot operate an appropriate terminal device are not excluded.
The conclusion that can be drawn so far from the information provided by the European Banking Authority is that anyone who can read between the lines will certainly already have an idea of where the journey is heading to in the future.
I'm pretty sure that the approach of cryptocurrencies so far, of wanting to free themselves from the central banking system, will set alarm bells ringing among the technocrats in Brussels. The idea of an anonymous or pseudonymous payment option as a kind of a digital variant of analog cash will also not be compatible with the goals of these circles, as can be seen, for example, from the worldwide campaigns to displace cash, which have been going on for a long time.
Freedom and self-determination are fundamentally a thorn in the flesh of the technocratic elites, and so they will also try to regulate everything in the crypto sector and press it into their templates. Whether such efforts will ultimately be successful remains to be seen, because after all, it is precisely this prospect of technocratic paternalism and social lack of freedom that is at least as big a thorn in the side of us freedom-loving citizens.
We will therefore have to stay on the ball and keep a close eye on this issue as well.
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
Yesterday, today and tomorrow: right in the middle of the "ID Study Days", the conclave of my parliamentary group in Paris. Here, we'll be talking about the cost-of-living increase, European banking supervision and other important topics. Later, there will also be a meeting with a representative of the Hungarian Fidesz ruling party. Looking forward! More info on our conclave to come later in an update.
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
Dear fellow citizens,
Thank you very much for your numerous letters, of which almost 1,000 e-mails have reached me in the last days and weeks. We all shared the concern that the EU Parliament might soon decide on an extension of the Digital COVID Certificate (Digital Green Certificate).
Unfortunately, our fears came true today and the "Digital Basic Rights Voucher" - a designation I consider much more appropriate here - was extended by another year until June 2023.
Of course, I voted against it together with some fellow campaigners, but the thirst of the majority of MEPs for further ways to restrict civil liberties and fundamental rights could not be overcome.
But today's vote also shows that I was unfortunately right again with my suspicions: The repeal of the previous Corona coercive measures seems to have been nothing more than a tactical retreat by the establishment. Too much pleasure has been taken in depriving citizens of their constitutional rights under the pretext of supposed "health care" and, if need be, restoring them in the case of government-friendly good behavior, as if they were privileges. Enjoy one last summer of freedom. Once it's over, we're all in for another pLandemic (sic) autumn and winter! But one thing is already certain: Our fight for freedom will continue!
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
Today I received an unexpected visit from Canada. The Parliamentary Security Service called me and told me that a gentleman from Canada was standing at the entrance with a huge bouquet of flowers and would like to talk to me.
As it turned out, it was Mr. Kim Tsoj ( @kim.tsoj ) from Montreal, who thanked me very warmly for my message to Justin Trudeau - during his recent presence in the EU Parliament - with a great bouquet of flowers. Mr. Tsoj is associated with the organizers of the Canadian Freedom Convoy and is also Vice President of the non-profit organization "Children's Freedom for Future".
Mr. Tsoj's visit made me extremely happy and I was very moved that he took this long way from Canada to the EU Parliament in Brussels to support my work. In future, we will remain in contact and are already making plans to further oppose the technocratic agenda of the global elites.
Mr. Tsoj, you are a true freedom fighter! Thank you very much for visiting me!
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
Dear fellow citizens,
this week the EU Parliament will vote on the extension of the digital vaccination passport (Digital Green COVID Certificate) for another year (until June 2023). This plan, in conjunction with the immense quantities of vaccine that the EU has already ordered to date, suggests a reasonable suspicion that the current relaxation of the state's Corona coercive measures is merely a brief tactical retreat by the politico-medial complex. The widespread protests by freedom-loving citizens became so strong and conspicuous at the beginning of this year that the governments' panic narrative could no longer be sustained. So now, in the slipstream of short-term relaxations, politicians are apparently preparing for the next level of coercive measures in the coming fall and winter.
A very recent and frightening example from China shows right now that the so-called "hygiene measures" are not so much about health protection, but obviously much more about the ultimate protection of politics from its own citizens.
A few days ago, several hundred annoyed Chinese bank customers, whose accounts had previously been frozen, planned to travel to the capital of the Henan province for a protest. However, this protest was thwarted by Chinese authorities in advance, as the health codes on the protesters' cell phones suddenly turned red upon arrival in Zhengzhou. Other travelers explained that their COVID digital ID had already switched to red the day before, shortly after they had reserved a train ticket to the capital online. The state-run »Global Times« also reported that for others affected, red codes suddenly turned back to green as soon as they left Zhengzhou.
Without a green code in their smartphone app, citizens lose access to public transport, to facilities such as shopping malls, supermarkets and restaurants, and the right to travel freely throughout the country. In short, the lives of those affected will be so severely restricted that they will come to a near standstill.
This dreadful event shows more than clearly what will still be possible with the Digital COVID Certificate here in Germany, in Europe and of course worldwide as a whole. It is not about protecting the health of the population, but about protecting governments and politics from inconvenient citizens and their legitimate use of democratic freedoms and fundamental rights. Democratic participation will then only be granted to those citizens who have previously been issued a "Digital Basic Rights Voucher" by the government. Everyone else instead will be sent straight into a “Democracy Lockdown”.
That leaders of Western states have already come to regard the principles of democracy and the rule of law as an inconvenient obstacle to gaining further power is demonstrated by figures such as Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has already publicly expressed his admiration for China's dictatorship. This means in a double sense: Red alert for liberty!
We are on the threshold of a dark age, and I promise you that as a member of the EU Parliament and the AfD party, I will continue to do everything in my power to prevent a slide into this diabolical abyss of arbitrariness, lack of freedom and governmental omnipotence.
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
___
http://www.reuters.com/.../china-bank-protest-stopped-by.../
last week we voted in the EU Parliament on a pro-abortion resolution, which fears that a leaked decision of the US Supreme Court would prove true, and that the democratic right of the Supreme Court judges would overturn something which has been problematic since it was made almost 50 years ago.
Roe vs Wade took away the possibility of US States to prosecute abortionists for taking the life of unborn children, deeming it a matter of privacy, and therefore a choice for the mother in the first trimester. This meant that it became a Federal matter based on the argument that the founding fathers intended such a ‘right’ when they wrote the US Constitution.
Putting aside that we are indeed talking about terminating a life, pregnancy is mostly not a stroke of fate which women have no control over. Advocating for unlimited abortion, declaring it a “human right” even, demeans women, as it denies them any ability to be responsible human beings. By no means are abortions an inconsequential ‘lifestyle-choice’ or just another contraceptive for ‘after the fact’. Abortion always entails the killing of an unborn child.
The EU has no competence over democratic decisions in cases before the Supreme Court of the United States of America. This EU resolution names individual US states that are implementing ‘heartbeat’ laws – whereby abortion is limited at various stages in the baby’s development. And it condemns them as being anti-women.
In the parliamentary debate, I said that we have no right to interfere with a rumour of what the US Supreme Court may do – nor should we exaggerate and call it a ‘global threat’. If they protect their young citizens in the womb – as even UN, European law and charters of fundamental rights mandate – then good for them; but we have no right and no competence to bully them into a different decision.
Socialist Maria Noichl was spitting mad as she reprimanded anyone who dared to think women should not be given full abortion rights globally. To her, even silence on this matter was ‘violence against women’. And Green Terry Reintke flouted Parliament rules by wearing a pro-abortion scarf, ignoring the demand of the President to remove it, as she screamed that she is “not a vessel to supply infants”. I doubt she would ever get the chance.
The French EU-Presidency and the EU-Commission were given their pro-abortion scripts, and quoted Simone Weil, Madeleine Albright and Hilary Clinton – those great bastions of human rights. I, and like-minded colleagues reminded all present that such views have no legal foundation, and that a culture of life is always much more precious than their cold culture of death.
Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP (AfD)
